Disposed
Arup Kumar Saha and 4 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/3246/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010121202023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010121202023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010121202023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3246/2023
ARUP KUMAR SAHA AND 4 ORS S/O- LATE ANIL KR. SAHA, RESIDENT OF NO. 2 COLONY, BISHNU NAGAR, P.O. AND DIST.- GOALPARA, PIN- 783101.
2: IMDADUL ISLAM S/O- LATE ABDUL MATLEB
R/O- NAYAPARA
P.O. AND DIST.- GOALPARA
PIN- 783101.
3: DILIP KUMAR PAUL S/O- LATE TARANI KANTA PAUL R/O- RESIDENT OF NO. 2 COLONY BISHNU NAGAR P.O. AND DIST.- GOALPARA
PIN- 783101.
4: DILIP KUMAR HAZARIKA S/O- LATE BIRENDRA HAZARIKA
VILL- DUBAPARA
P.O.- DUBAPARA
DIST.- GOALPARA
PIN- 783101.
Page No.# 2/3
5: HITESH CHAKRAVORTY S/O- LATE TARUN CHAKRAVORTY
R/O- BIHU FIELD NEW GOALPARA P.O.- BALADMARI DIST.- GOALPARA PIN- 783121 VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, P.W.D. BUILDING, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD GOALPARA AND SOUTH SALMARA TERRITORIAL BUILDING DIVISION GOALPARA- 783101. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. BUILDING DIVISION GOALPARA- 783101. 4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 29. 5:THE TRESEARY OFFICER GOALPARA PIN- 783101
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID, MS. T BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, FINANCE,SC, AG
Page No.# 3/3
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
04.11.2024
Mr. A Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have already got the relief and therefore, they no longer wish to press the matter.
In view of above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Comparing Assistant
ARUP KUMAR SAHA AND 4 ORS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
NELSON SAILO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court