This Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner as infructuous due to the efflux of time, rendering the matter no longer tenable.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010101422020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2973/2020
RAM NARAYAN MEDHI
S/O- LT. RATNESWAR MEDHI, VILL- SORBHOG TOWN (MEDHIPARA), WARD NO.- 3, P.O. AND P.S. SORBHOG, DIST.- BARPETA (ASSAM), PIN781317
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FINANCE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND TREASURIES ASSAM KAR BHAWAN GANESHGURI GHY-06
3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GHY-29 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE) BOKAKHAT DIVISION BOKAKHAT DIST.- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM) PIN- 785612 5:THE TREASURY OFFICER BARPETA TREASURY DIST.- BARPETA
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM PIN- 78130
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
15.07.2024
Shri K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous.
Shri D. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Assam and Shri R.R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE are present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infrucutous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
RAM NARAYAN MEDHI
THE STATE OF ASSAM
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
