Writ petition concerning workmen of a tea estate was withdrawn by counsel's prayer with liberty to file afresh. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010010392014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2734/2014
THE WORKMAN OF DEHA TEA ESTATE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, ASSAM CHAH KARMACHARI SANGHA, JORHAT CIRCLE, DIST- JORHAT, PIN-785001, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE MANAGEMENT OF DEHA TEA ESTATE and ANR. P.O. JORHAT, PIN-785001, DIST- JORHAT, ASSAM
2:THE PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL DIBRUGARH PIN-786001 ASSAM ADDRESS RECTIFIED VIDE H.C.O. DTD. 30.07.201
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A BHATTACHARYYA
Advocate for the Respondent : MRSS KEJRIWAL
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
15.02.2024
Ms. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. S.K. Kejriwal, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.1
The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
The Workman of Deha Tea Estate represented by the Secretary, Assam Chah Karmachari Sangha, Jorhat Circle
The Management of Deha Tea Estate
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Dibrugarh
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
