Dismissed
Md. Manowar Hussain v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/2304/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010082742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010082742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010082742024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2304/2024
MD. MANOWAR HUSSAIN
S/O- LATE ANOWAR HUSSAIN, VILLAGE AND P.O. SANOWA, P.S. SIPAJHAR, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM- 784145
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER ASSAM IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003
3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT (MINOR) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MANGALDAI DIVISION (IRRIGATION) MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM- 784125 5:THE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM (SEBA) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-2
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE, MD S HOQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, SC, SEBA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 07-08-2024
Mr. S. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner with the consent of the other side prays for allowing him to withdraw this writ petition.
The prayer is allowed.
This writ petition is dismissed on being withdrawn.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Md. Manowar Hussain
The State of Assam
The Chief Engineer Assam Irrigation Department
The Superintending Engineer Irrigation Department (Minor)
The Executive Engineer Mangaldai Division
The Board of Secondary Education Assam
Budi Habung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court