Nabam Kaya v. The State of Ap 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC040007012024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC040007012024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC040007012024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/215/2024
Nabam Kaya
Son of Shri Nabam Takam, a permanent residence of Sakiang, Mengio, PO Mengio, PS Sagalee, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP 4 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Executive Magistrate Age: 0 Occupation :
3:The Superintendent of Police Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Extra Assistant Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : 5:M/s Jerkin Entierprise Age: 0 Occupation
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/4
Linked Case : WP(C)/216/2024 Taba Mama Jambo Age: 37 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Taba Nikia a residence of Sakiang Village Mengio PO Meengio PS Sagalee Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Executive Magistrate Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Sagalee PO and PS Sagalee Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 3:The Superintendent of Police Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Papumpare District Yupia PO Yupia PS Doimukh Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 4:The Extra Assistant Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Mengio PO Mengio PS Sagalee Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh
Page No.# 3/4
5:M/s Jerkin Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:proprietor Shri Chukhu Takam Sarchgai Village PO Mengio PS Sagalee Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh -----------Advocate for : Taba Topu Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 4 Ors: Advocate , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively.
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
02.09.2024
Mr. L. Kagung, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition.
Ms. R. Basor, learned State Counsel is present.
Accordingly, this writ petition is closed on withdrawal.
Page No.# 4/4
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nabam Kaya
The State of Assam and 4
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court