In the absence of the petitioner appearing to represent his case, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010062582019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2038/2019
DINESH ROY S/O- LT UPEN ROY, R/O- PUB- MATIA, P.O. AND P.S. MATIA, DISTGOALPARA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND MANAGEMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM 3:THE ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISASTER AND MANAGEMENT BRANCH GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM
4:THE DISTRICT FISHERY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GOALPARA ASSAM 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER MATIA REVENUE CIRCLE DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM 6:THAT OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MATIA P.S.
Page No.# 2/2
DIST- GOALPAR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. L DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
29.04.2024.
None appears for the petitioner on call.
Ms. U. Das, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, Assam is present for the State respondent.
It is noticed that on the last two consecutive occasions also, nobody represented the petitioner.
In view of above and considering that the petitioner appears to be not interested in pursuing the present Writ Petition, the same is dismissed for nonprosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dinesh Roy
The State of Assam
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
