Tapojyoti Sengupta v. Gauhati Municipal Corporation and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010035972022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010035972022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010035972022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1542/2022
TAPOJYOTI SENGUPTA
S/O ASHISH SENGUPTA, HOUSE NO.10, KALYANI SREEMANTA BHAWAN, DANISH ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001
VERSUS
GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001
2:MAYOR-IN-COUNCIL (APPEAL) GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001
3:THE MAYOR GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001
4:THE COMMISSIONER GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001
5:THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL ZONE GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Page No.# 2/2
PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001
7:THE MUNICIPAL SECRETARY GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GMC
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
02-02-2024
Heard Mr. D. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner would be filing an application before the GMC authorities to change the Trade License from his father’s name to his name and also would be asking for renewal of the Trade License. He further submits that he would also like to make an application for impleadment/substitution in Appeal No. GCL/02/2017 which is pending before the Mayor-in-Council, Guwahati, as his father, who was the respondent expired on 07.12.2019.
Ms. S. Chutia, learned counsel appearing for the GMC submits that she does not have any objection to the prayer made by the petitioner’s counsel.
The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed
for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tapojyoti Sengupta
Gauhati Municipal Corporation
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court