Writ petition was closed as infructuous because the petitioner, who sought a Police Safety Order, had expired in the interim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010193672017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1350/2017
ABDUL AHAD CHOUDHURY
S/O LT. TAHIDUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY, VILL. and P.O. SUTARKANDI, P.S. and DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN- 788712
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., ASSAM CIVIL SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GHY-6, ASSAM
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE ULUBARI GHY-7
3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SB ASSAM POLICE ULUBARI GHY-7
4:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SOUTH ASSAM RANGE AT SILCHAR ASSAM P.O. SILCHAR- 1 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KARIMGANJ DISTRICT ASSAM P.O. KARIMGANJ PIN-78871
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S D PURAKAYATHA, MR.U CHOUDHURY,MS.B CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY Order
11.09.2024
It is submitted that the petitioner has in the meantime expired. Therefore, there shall be no cause of action to pursue this writ petition as the prayer made was to provide PSO to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed being infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
ABDUL AHAD CHOUDHURY
STATE OF ASSAM
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
