Ranjit Das v. the Union of India and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging a tender notice for sale of minor minerals. The Court held that the petitions were infructuous because the five-year tender period had already expired, leading to the vacation of the interim order. Respondents permitted to issue fresh tenders following the law.
What did the court decide?
Interim order passed earlier is vacated; respondents are at liberty to call for fresh tenders for sale of minor minerals following the mandate of law.