Sri Jogendra Chandra Roy v. Smt. Sanibala Roy and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal concerning a property dispute was withdrawn on instructions of the appellant's counsel and accordingly dismissed.
Second appeal concerning a property dispute was withdrawn on instructions of the appellant's counsel and accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010248112018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/68/2019
SRI JOGENDRA CHANDRA ROY S/O- LATE NALO CHANDRA ROY R/O- VILL.- SOUTH ROYPUR, PART-III, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
SMT. SANIBALA ROY AND 4 ORS. W/O- LATE SURENDRA ROY, R/O- VILL.- SOUTH ROYPUR, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM.
2:SRI AMALENDU ROY S/O- LATE DHIREN ROY
R/O- VILL.- SOUTH ROYPUR P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM.
3:SRI SANTI ROY R/O- VILL.- SOUTH ROYPUR P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM.
4:SRI KAMAL SARKAR S/O- LATE KECHALU SARKAR R/O- VILL.- SOUTH ROYPUR P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2
5:SRI KAMALA KANTA ROY S/O- LATE SARBANANDA ROY
PROCESS SERVER DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A RAHMAN (R1-R4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
13.06.2024.
Shri J Hatimuria, learned counsel for the appellant submits that there are instructions to withdraw this appeal.
Shri A Rahman, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4 is present.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sri Jogendra Chandra Roy
Smt. Sanibala Roy
Sri Amalendu Roy
Sri Santi Roy
Sri Kamal Sarkar
Sri Kamala Kanta Roy
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court