The Gauhati High Court held that the sole appellant had expired, causing the appeal to abate and close. The LCR was ordered to be returned to the lower court.
The LCR be returned by the Registry to the learned Court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010005802009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/136/2009
SMT GEDO BALA BARMAN,
W/O LATE FUTURAM BARMAN, VILL. KAIMARI PT.-V, P.O. BATERHAT, P.S. GOLOKGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
MANORANJAN BARMAN and ANR, S/O LATE SARAT CHANDRA BARMAN, VILL. ATHGHARITARI, P.S. GOLOKGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM.
2:RATHI KANTA ROY
S/O LATE SASHI MOHAN ROY VILL. ATHGHARITARI P.S. GOLOKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G P BHOWMIK
Advocate for the Respondent : MISS.J R BORA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
03.04.2024
When the matter came up before this Court on 26.09.2023, it was informed to this Court that the sole appellant had expired. Thereupon, no steps have been taken. The instant appeal therefore stands abated and closed.
The LCR be returned by the Registry to the learned Court below.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smt Gedo Bala Barman
Manoranjan Barman and Anr
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
