respondent no. 5 was not a selected candidate and in the event, the eligibility of the candidate against Sl. No. 1, Aparna Devi was found fault with by this Court, it should have been the writ petitioner who was required to be given the offer of appointment. The petitioner has also relied upon certain certificates on the aspect of eligibility regarding the place of residence. To examine the aforesaid aspect, this Court has looked into the materials placed on record. Though there are certain certificates which have been annexed with the review as well as writ petition, anomalies are found both with the issuing authorities and the translations made. While the petitioner places reliance on the certificate issued by one Deobar Deka, Government Gaonburah of Dekargaon Village, in the translated version, the village has been written as Dekargaon, Jaberikuchi, Balobara Tuk. The aforesaid aspect has, however, been fairly admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant. What is also to be noted is that the report dated 04.09.2015, so far as the petitioner is concerned, shows that her certificate has been said to be issued by one Bangshidhar Deka and not Deobar Deka as claimed by the petitioner. The said aspect has also been clearly stated in the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent no.4 on 29.11.2019. In paragraph 3 of the said affidavit-in-opposition, the following has been stated:
