Interlocutory application in a writ petition involving ITBP service matters; as the connected writ petition was dismissed the same day, the application stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040003652024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/48/2024
Rohit Mele
Son of Late Chiyi Mele, resident of Etalin Village, Po and PS Anini, Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The Union of India and 3 Ors through the Director General ITBP MHA Govt of India, Block 2 CCGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 2:The Inspector General Age: 0 Occupation : North East Frontier HQ ITBP MHA Govt. of India Khatting Hill Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. Pin 791111
3:The DIG SHQ Age: 0 Occupation : Dibrugarh ITBP MHA Govt. of India Mohanbari District Dibrugarh Assam. Pin 786012
4:The Commandant Age: 0 Occupation :
Page No.# 2/2
9th ITBP Lohitpur PO Tezu District Lohit Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 79200
Advocate for the Petitioner : Madan Mili, T Siga,A Tiwari
Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 16-09-2024
Heard Mr. D. Das, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Mr. M. Kato, learned CGC for the opposite parties.
As the connected writ petition has been dismissed vide order passed today i.e. on 16.09.2024, this interlocutory application stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rohit Mele
The Union of India (through Director General, ITBP)
Inspector General, North East Frontier HQ ITBP
DIG SHQ Dibrugarh ITBP
Commandant, 9th ITBP Lohitpur
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
