with Section 151 of the CPC and vide order dated 30.09.2021, the learned Civil Judge No. 2, Kamrup, Guwahati had restrained the defendants particularly the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 from proceeding with any construction work over the Schedule-A property as well as from alienating and transferring the same to any other intending purchaser till disposal of the suit. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know that the defendant No. 2, in spite of the order dated 30.09.2021, had entered into an agreement for sale with intending purchasers. Thereafter, the petitioner had visited the suit property to know about the present status and found that the defendants had been proceeding with construction work in disregard to the order dated 30.09.2021, passed in Misc. (J) Case No. 387/2020. Thereafter, the petitioner had approached the Bharalumukh P.S. and requested them to enforce the injunction order to stop the construction work. Then, the petitioner had filed one separate application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC, upon which Misc. (J) Case No. 117/2022 was registered and the same is still pending for disposal. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed another application under Section 151 of the CPC with a prayer to direct the police of Bharalumukh P.S. to enforce the order of injunction dated 30.09.2021 and the same is also pending for disposal, and in spite of pendency of the aforesaid two applications, the defendant No. 2 has been proceeding with the construction work over the schedule suit property and thereafter, the petitioner had filed another petition No. 1435/2022, under Order 39 Rule 7, and Section 151 of the CPC for protection and preservation of the suit property by stopping the ongoing construction over the same by enforcing the trial Court’s order dated 30.09.2021. Mr. Bhuyan further submits that the respondent No. 1 had filed objection in the said petition and thereafter, hearing the learned Advocates of both the parties, the learned trial Court, vide impugned order dated 05.09.2022,
