Mehbub Rahman, v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition heard by the Gauhati High Court; the Court noted the informant was not made a party and directed that the informant be arrayed as respondent No. 2 before adjourning.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010121292024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./229/2024
MEHBUB RAHMAN
S/O IMAN ALI, VILL- FALIHAMARI PATHER, P.O.-FALIHAMARI PATHER, P.S.-BHURAGAON, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J AHMED, MR N ZAMAN,H G DAISY,MS A HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/705/2024
MEHBUB RAHMAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MEHBUB RAHMAN
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Coram
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.)/705/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court