conviction and sentence passed against the present accused-appellant [A-1] is concerned, had observed that the trial court without recording the evidence of the Autopsy Doctor relied on the Post-Mortem Examination Report. It was observed that when the Post-Mortem Examination Report was available, the Autopsy Doctor ought to have been examined to ascertain the cause of death of the deceased. The case was remanded back to the learned trial court for a fresh decision against the present accused-appellant, Shyamal Paul [A-1] after recording the evidence of the Autopsy Doctor who performed the post-mortem examination on the deadbody of the deceased, Uma Paul and to write a fresh Judgment and Order thereafter. On being remanded the case back to the learned trial court with the above direction, the trial court examined the Autopsy Doctor as P.W.7 on 25.07.2017 and the present accused-appellant [A-1] was examined under Section 313, CrPC thereafter, on 22.12.2017, for providing an opportunity to explain the circumstances appearing against him from the testimony of P.W.7. Thereafter, the learned trial court heard the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned defence counsel. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after appreciation of the evidence/materials on record, the Judgment and Order, impugned herein, was delivered finding the accusedappellant [A-1] guilty for the offence of murder under Section 302, IPC. Hence, the instant appeal.
