The Gauhati High Court dropped a contempt petition filed by the petitioner after the counsel submitted that an earlier order had been duly complied with. No substantive decision was rendered on the merits.
The instant contempt petition stands dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023142023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/60/2023
MUKUL CH DAS
S/O SRI GHANAKANTA DAS, R/O JANAKPUR, JATIA, GUWAHATI, P.S.DISPUR, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
PALLAV GOPAL JHA, IAS AND ANR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT, GUWAHATI, HENRABARI, ASSAM-781006
2:GAURI SHANKAR DAS ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BHATTACHARJEE
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S S GUPTA (R-1)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
05.02.2024
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. M Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the order dated 18.11.2022 passed in WP(C)No.7342/2022 had been duly complied with for which the petitioner would not like to proceed with the instant contempt petition.
Taking into account the above, the instant contempt petition stands dropped.
Mr. SS Gupta, the learned counsel on behalf of respondent No.1 is present.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
MUKUL CH DAS
PALLAV GOPAL JHA
GAURI SHANKAR DAS
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
