Abutalha MD Samsuzzuha v. Suranjana Senapati , Acs
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition challenging delay in decision on petitioner's representation is closed after the respondent counsel assured communication of the pending decision within two days.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; assurance given for decision communication.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010094752024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/335/2024
ABUTALHA MD SAMSUZZUHA S/O- ATAUR RAHMAN, R/O VILLAGE- PANIKHAITI, P.O- AMINPARA, DIST-DARRANG , ASSAM
VERSUS
SURANJANA SENAPATI , ACS
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA , GUWAHATI-19
For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. A. Ali, Advocate For respondent(s) : Mr. R. Mazumder, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
19.07.2024
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abutalha Md SamzuZZuha S/o Ataur Rahman
- respondent
Suranjana Senapati, ACS
- respondent
The Director of Elementary Education, Assam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/335/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court