Winding-up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act against a respondent never served with notice, filed 18 years ago. The Court found the petition was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond the period for the debt due on 31.03.2001, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010069462004
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Co.Pet./16/2004
ART PRINTING HOUSE
CARRIED ON A PARTNERSHIP FIRM STYLO GRAPHICS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 43, EUROPEAN ASYLUM LANE, KOLKATA 700016, REPRESENTED BY SRI MANOHARLAL JAIN CHAIRMAN/DIRECTOR
VERSUS
NATIONAL PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED
A COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MAKUM ROAD, TINSUKIA 786125 (ASSAM) WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
Advocate for the Petitioner(s) : Ms. K. Yadav
Advocate for the respondent(s): None appears
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 07.08.2024
This is an application under Section 433(e) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent Company.
Page No.# 2/2
matter has been listed before this Court.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a company petition filed after the limitation period expired should be continued.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Art Printing House carried on a partnership firm Stylo Graphics Pvt. Ltd., represented by Sri Manoharlal Jain
National Plywood Industries Limited
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
