Interlocutory application seeking substitution of legal representatives of proforma respondent No.1 was rejected, as the delay in preferring the application was not condoned in a related application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010226842022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/601/2024
ASMOT PARAMANIK @ ASMAT ALI PARAMANIK S/O LATE SAHEB ALI PARAMANIK RESIDENT OF BAMUNPARA PART V PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348
VERSUS ABDUL BATEN AND ORS. S/O ABDUS SATTAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HATIPOTA PART II PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 2:ASHAN PARAMANIK S/O LATE SAHEB PARAMANIK RESIDENT OF BAMUNPARA PART V PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 3:AZAM PARAMANIK S/O LATE SAHEB PARAMANIK RESIDENT OF BAMUNPARA PART V PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 4:KURAN PARAMANIK S/O LATE RAHMAT PARAMANIK RESIDENT OF BAMUNPARA PART V
Page No.# 2/3
PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 5:MATLEB PARAMANIK S/O LATE RUSTOM PARAMANIK RESIDENT OF BAMUNPARA PART V PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 6:SRI TULBAR ALI @ MASHAN ALI S/O LATE JHALKU SK VILLAGE SATBAR 7:SRI RANJAN KALITA S/O UNKNOWN VILLAGE DURGAPUR BILASIPARA TOWN 8:SRI DIPAK KUMAR PATOR S/O LILA KR. PATOR VILLAGE DIMATOLA WARD NO. 3 PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 783348 9:LEGAL HEIRS OF MANGAL CH. DAS BABLU SARKAR RESIDENT OF RAMFALBIL KOKRAJHAR TOWN PO AND PS KOKRAJHAR DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 10:CHANDRA SARKAR RESIDENT OF RAMFALBIL KOKRAJHAR TOWN PO AND PS KOKRAJHAR DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 11:SOPRA MAJUMDAR RESIDENT OF RAMFALBIL KOKRAJHAR TOWN PO AND PS KOKRAJHAR DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR. M A SHEIKH Advocate for : MR. M U MAHMUD appearing for ABDUL BATEN AND ORS.
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
04.03.2024
Taking into account that the delay in preferring the application for substituting the legal representatives of the proforma respondent No.1 was not condoned vide order dated 04.03.2024 in IA(C)No.599/2024, the instant the interlocutory application stands rejected.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing an application to substitute legal representatives of a proforma respondent should be condoned.
Asmot Paramanik @ Asmat Ali Paramanik
Abdul Baten
Ashan Paramanik
Azam Paramanik
Kuran Paramanik
Matleb Paramanik
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
