Ratikanta Nath Laskar, v. Uddab Chandra Das and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory application in a pending contempt case was permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to re-file if so advised.
Interlocutory application in a pending contempt case was permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to re-file if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010085992023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1204/2023
In Cont.Cas(C) 118/2015
RATIKANTA NATH LASKAR, S/O- LT. RAMONI MOHON NATH LASKAR, VILL.- BAROMONI, P.O.- NARSINGPUR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
UDDAB CHANDRA DAS AND ANR THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GHY- 19.
2:DR. SURANJANA SENAPATI AT PRESENT THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-1
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T U LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU.
– B E F O R E –
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER
03.01.2024
On the prayer made by Mr. T.U. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the
Page No.# 2/2
applicant, I.A.(Civil) No.1204/2023 stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to re-file, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ratikanta Nath Laskar
Uddab Chandra Das
The Director of Elementary Education, Assam
Dr. Suranjana Senapati
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court