Sarmin Akhtar v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner; dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file a fresh petition.
Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner; dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010142722024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2092/2024
SARMIN AKHTAR
D/O NUR HAMMOD, W/O MD AKAH, R/O VILL- ALI NAGAR, P.S.ASTAGRAM, DIST- KISHOREGANJ, BANGALDESH. P/R/O VILL- GUBIBAG GOBAJAR, DHAKA, SAIDABAD (30/1 GULABA), P.S.-WARI, DIST- DHAKA, BANGLADESH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P K DAS, MR. M BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER
07.08.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr P K Das, is present.
Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present on behalf of the
State respondent.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the petition.
Petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sarmin Akhtar
The State of Assam represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam
Susmita Phukan Khaund
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court