Nayandeep Deka Baruah @ Nayandeep Sonowal v. The State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application under Section 483 BNSS, the court rejected the claim of default bail as the trial offence attracted a 90-day investigation period. Finding sufficient incriminating material including drug seizure, the court denied bail, holding the matter remains under initial investigation.
What did the court decide?
Bail application stands rejected; petitioner is not entitled to release on bail at this stage.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC040012912024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : BA/96/2024
Nayandeep Deka Baruah @ Nayandeep Sonowal
Son of Late Budheswar Sonowal, resident of Nemukur Gaon, PO Bamrajabari, Nitai Pukhuri Gaon, Sibsagar, Assam 785671
VERSUS
The State of AP represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : 1 B Deori, N Barman,A Timung
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether default bail is entitled after 60 days considering the 90-day investigation period for offences punishable with 10 years imprisonment.
Whether bail should be granted given sufficient incriminating material and the active stage of investigation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nayandeep Deka Baruah
- respondent
State of AP
Coram
Budi Habung
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA/96/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court