Sibnath Ghosh v. the Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The court found the appeal infructuous as an arbitrator was appointed and had already passed an award, which was challenged under Section 34. The appeal stands closed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal stands closed as infructuous. The Local Court Record (LCR) to be returned.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010144182009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Arb.A./1/2009
SIBNATH GHOSH
S/O-LATE NIRENDRA NATH GHOSH, R/O-SREE MAA SARANI, SOUTH BABUPARA, SILIGURI, DIST-DARJEELING , W.B.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA and ORS REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, N.F.RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI-11.
2:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER WORKS
N.F.RAILWAY KATIHAR BIHAR.
3:THE SR. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER/LINE
N.F.RAILWAY KATIHAR BIHAR
Advocate for the appellant(s): Mr. A A Ahmed
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act is maintainable in view of the subsequent appointment of an arbitrator and issuance of award under Section 34.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sibnath Ghosh
- respondent
The Union of India
- respondent
General Manager, N.F.Railway
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- Arb.A./1/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court