This judgment converts an interim anticipatory bail order into an absolute bail order. The court held that since the applicant cooperated with the investigation and the case diary showed no immediate need for custodial interrogation, the bail was granted.
Anticipatory bail is made absoluteIn accordance with terms of Interim Order dated 10.04.2024
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010074092024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/969/2024
MUSHTAQ AHMED
S/O FAIZUDDIN AHMED, R/O HOUSE NO. 2, BIRINA PATH, JANAKPUR, KAHILIPARA, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
Date : 26.04.2024
Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Page No.# 2/3
for grant of pre-arrest bail.
Page No.# 3/3
investigation, seems to be not warranted here in this case.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail order should be made absolute given the applicant's cooperation with the investigation.
Whether custodial interrogation is warranted at the current stage of investigation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mushtaq Ahmed
The State of Assam
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
