Anticipatory bail application disposed of after the State reported that a charge sheet had been submitted against the petitioners. The court directed them to seek regular bail before the Trial Court and vacated the earlier interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010070402024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/914/2024
MD NABI HUSSAIN AND ANR
S/O ALI HUSSAIN, R/O VILL- GERUATI, P.S.-KHATOWAL, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAM
2: SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O NAJIMADDIN R/O VILL- TENGABASTI P.S.-MAHABHAIRAB DIST- SONITPUR ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 13.06.2024
Mr. K.K. Parasar, the learned Additional P.P. submits that in this case, the police has submitted charge sheet against the petitioners vide Charge Sheet No.
Page No.# 2/2
30/2024 dated 20.04.2024.
Therefore, the petitioners are directed to approach the learned Trial Court seeking regular bail.
The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
The bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioners, against whom a charge sheet has been filed, be granted bail or directed to seek regular bail from the Trial Court?
MD Nabi Hussain
Saddam Hussain
The State of Assam represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
