Allowed

Jayanta Das v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC2 Sept 2024AB/846/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court converted an interim pre-arrest bail pending application into an absolute bail order for the petitioner Jayanta Das, who had recorded his statement and complied with prior conditions regarding Sections 341, 325, 307, 386, and 34 IPC.

What did the court decide?

The interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated 02.04.2024 is hereby made absolute on specified conditions.

Jayanta Das Vs the State of Assam — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/2

¶2

GAHC010068382024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/846/2024

¶5

JAYANTA DAS S/O PARESH DAS R/O CHECHAMUKH DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781104

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T SOM, MR. R P SARMAH

¶9

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. A K SINGH(INFORMANT/ VICTIM),MR. N ANAND (INFORMANT/ VICTIM)

¶10

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Date : 03-09-2024

¶13

Heard Ms. T. Som, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

¶14

By way of instituting the present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner namely, Jayanta Das, has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Hajo P.S. Case No.99/2024 registered

¶15

Page No.# 2/2

¶16

under Sections 341/325/307/386/34 IPC.

¶17

This Court vide order dated 02.04.2024 was pleased to grant the benefit of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶18

It is submitted at the Bar that in terms of the conditions as imposed by this Court, while granting interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, the petitioner has appeared before the I/O and recorded his statement.

¶19

It is also submitted that the petitioner has not taken any undue advantage of the interim prearrest bail as granted to him by this Court.

¶20

In view of the above position and also considering that the statement of the petitioner has been recorded, there would be no further occasion for any custodial interrogation in the matter, the interim bail granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2024 is hereby made absolute on the following terms and conditions:-

¶21

i. the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required;

¶22

ii. the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any other police officer, and

¶23

iii. the petitioner shall not hamper the investigation or temper with the evidence of the case.

¶24

With the above observation and direction, the Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed

¶25

of.

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

Comparing Assistant

Jayanta Das v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayanta Das v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Das @ Paniram Vs the State of Assam

Nazrul Hoque Laskar Vs the State of Assam

Tajmul Hussain Vs the State of Assam

Nazibul Islam and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Sadananda Das Vs the State of Assam

Rafij Uddin @ Rahij Uddin Vs the State of Assam