Anticipatory bail application; counsel submitted it had become infructuous as the applicant was already arrested in another case, and sought permission to withdraw. The court allowed withdrawal and disposed of the application as withdrawn, without deciding the merits of bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010062412024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/797/2024
SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O ATAR ALI VILL- NO. 1 BARCHALA P.S.LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD B ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
Date : 14.05.2024
Mr. A. Alam, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this application has become infructuous as the applicant has already been arrested in another case and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. Prayer is allowed.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Saddam Hussain
The State of Assam
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
