Abdul Basit v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Gauhati High Court, while granting bail, gathered evidence.
What did the court decide?
The interim order dated 22.02.2024 was made absolute; case disposed of; case diary returned.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010033162024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/420/2024
ABDUL BASIT S/O RAHIM ALI R/O - KHANDARKARPARA, P.O - BHELLA, DIST - BARPETA ,ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER
08.05.2024
Heard Mr. H. Bezbarua, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim bail grant dated 22.02.2024 should be made absolute in favour of the applicant.
Whether custodial interrogation of the applicant is warranted given the progress of the investigation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abdul Basit
- respondent
The State of Assam Rep. by the PP, Assam
Coram
Robin Phukan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/420/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court