Hailakandi HC ordered dismissal of a second bail application by the petitioner. The court rejected parity arguments regarding another accused, noting distinct criminal footings, and found no new grounds to revisit the earlier rejection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010279012023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/4171/2023
FAKRUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA S/O- ARJAMAND ALI BARBHUIYA, VILLAGE -BILPAR DHUMKAR, P.O- RANGAUTI, P.S- HAILAKANDI, DIST- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788155
VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
04.01.2024
Heard Mr. S Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
Page No.# 2/3
the second time praying for grant of pre arrest bail, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Hailakandi PS case No. 232/2023 registered under Section 120-B/403/409/420/387/506/34 IPC.
Page No.# 3/3
has also considered the stage of investigation, which also suggests that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may be necessary.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail considering prior rejection and availability of incriminating materials.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fakrul Islam Barbhuiya
State of Assam
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
