In this bail or quashing application challenging proceedings under Sections 376 and others IPC, the Gauhati High Court inclined to dismiss the petition and granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate jurisdictional court.
Application closed with liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010140052024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1870/2024
TAHUR ALI
S/O LATE KAIMUDDIN SHEIKH, VILL- JAMLAI, CHENIMARI, P.S.NAGARBERA, DIST- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK, P. KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 13.09.2024
Heard Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. S.H. Borah, learned APP has submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in connection with Nagarbera P.S. Case No. 69/2024, under Section 447/341/354/376/511 IPC vide charge-sheet no. 52/2024.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, the Court is inclined to close this application by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Court.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application for quashing of proceedings under Section 342 CrPC should be allowed.
TAHUR ALI S/O LATE KAIMUDDIN SHEIKH
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
KALYAN RAI SURANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
