Rustam Ali Sk v. the State of Assam and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010022622023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010022622023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010022622023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/681/2023
RUSTAM ALI SK
S/O- LT. SAHAR ALI SK., R/O- VILL- DEBOTTARHASDAHA PT-VI, P.O. DEBOTTARHASDAHA, P.S. GAURIPUR, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DHUBRI P.O. P.S. AND DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301 4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI PIN- 783301 5:THE DY. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301
6:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
Page No.# 2/3
GOLAKGANJ P.O. AND P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN7:THE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF HAJI AINUDDIN SARKER MEMORIAL L.P. SCHOOL REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT NOWSHAD ALI SK. S/O- LT. TOBBEL ALI SK. R/O- VILL- DEBOTTARHASDAHA PT-VI P.O. DEBOTTARHASDAHA P.S. GAURIPUR DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783334 8:AMZAD ALI SK. S/O- LT. TOBBEL ALI SK. R/O- VILL- DEBOTTARHASDAHA PT-VI P.O. DEBOTTARHASDAHA P.S. GAURIPUR DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78333
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER
03-05-2023
Heard Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K.Borah, learned Standing counsel, Department of School Education, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 6. Also heard Mr. G. Bokolial, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 3.
Page No.# 3/3
On instructions of the petitioner, Mr. Rahman, learned counsel is not pressing this writ petition to which the learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Rustam Ali Sk
The State of Assam and Ors.
Manash Ranjan Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court