Anil Kumar Bayan and 5 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought relief regarding provincialisation of services. The court noted that four petitioners already received benefits and one had a pending process, finding grievances substantially redressed, and closed the writ petition without further orders.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010027362016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6239/2016
ANIL KUMAR BAYAN and 5 ORS
S/O- SRI ANANTA RAM BAYAN, R/O- UDALGURI, MISSION ROAD, P.O. and DIST.- UDALGURI, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN- 784509.
2: PUNU KALITA W/O- SRI SUJIT BISWAS R/O- UDALGURI BAPUJI NAGAR P.O. and DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784509.
3: MANTU KALITA S/O- LT BHABEN KALITA R/O- UDALGURI WARD NO. 2 P.O. and DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784509.
4: HARESWAR DEKA S/O- SRI BALORAM DEKA R/O VILL.- BARHATA P.O.- DAGAON P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI DIST.- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781133.
5: RAHUL DEV BRAHMA S/O- SRI DIMBESWAR BRAHMA R/O- UDALGURI
Page No.# 2/3
WARD NO. 5 P.O. and DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784509. 6: JWNGTIMA BASUMATARY D/O- SRI SUKUMAR NARZARY R/O VILL.- PURANI GORAIBARI P.O. and DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784509
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition proceeds after petitioners obtained provincialisation benefits
Whether the petition admits a cause of action
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANIL KUMAR BAYAN and 5 ORS
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
Coram
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/6239/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court