Petitioner withdrew his writ petition upon instructions. The court closes the petition without any substantive adjudication or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010134952017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4297/2017
EJAJUL HUSSAIN
S/O MD. TAFAJUL HUSSAIN, R/O VILL. MOIDOMIA, P.O. MOIDOMIA, P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN 787001
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF
ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT., SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-6
2:RESPONDENT – 6
RESPONDENT -
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.D GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 15.03.2023
Mr.U.K.Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions does not press this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed.
Mr.U.Sharma, learned standing counsel for the Secondary Education Department as well as Ms. B.B.Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 are present.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
EJAJUL HUSSAIN
THE STATE OF ASSAM
KALYAN RAI SURANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
