Nirakar Mallick v. the Union of India and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court found the petitioner had been promoted during the pendency of the petition, rendering the matter infructuous; the writ petition was closed, though monetary claims were directed to appropriate authorities.
What did the court decide?
None granted; petition closed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010134972019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4146/2019
NIRAKAR MALLICK
S/O- SRI MAGUNI MALLICK, PRESENT SERVING AS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPTT OF SOCIOLOGY, ASSAM UNIVERSITY, SILCHAR, DISTCACHAR, ASSAM, R/O- ASSAM UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR COLONY, DARGAKONA, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788011
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MIN OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, DEPTT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110011
2:THE VICE CHANCELLOR CUM CHAIRPERSON EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ASSAM UNIVERSITY SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788011 3:THE REGISTRAR CUM EX OFFICIO SECRETARY ASSAM UNIVERSITY SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788011
4:THE FINANCE OFFICER ASSAM UNIVERSITY SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78801
Page No.# 2/3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nirakar Mallick
- respondent
The Union of India
Coram
Kalyan Rai Surana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/4146/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court