Icco Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a writ petition that stands closed and withdrawn in view of an accompanying interlocutory application order without substantive adjudication on merits.
This is a writ petition that stands closed and withdrawn in view of an accompanying interlocutory application order without substantive adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010197062023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No.: WP(C)/3450/2017
ICCO PVT. LTD. REGD OFFICE AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI- 781021 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA R/O- PUB SARANIA GUWAHATI- 782003 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6
2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI- 21 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A GOVT. OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM ------------
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. A. Narzari, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : None appears
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
07.09.2023
In view of the order passed in the accompanying Interlocutory Application, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
ICCO PVT. LTD.
STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court