Writ petition under the challenge to state impugned act or law was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005612023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 205/2023
1:Donik Taying and Anr. S/o Lt. Donik Tashi, Village Pith, PO/PS Ziro, Circle Yachuli, Lower Subansiri District. Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Donik Pee W/o Shri Donik Taying
Village Pith PO/PS Ziro Circle Yachuli Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors.
Represented by the Secretary, Department of Land Management, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Director Land Management Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
3:The Deputy Commissioner Lower Subansiri District Ziro Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer
Page No.# 2/2
Lower Subansiri District Ziro Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Neelam Taje
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA
ORDER
Date : 03.05.2023
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Donik Taying and Anr.
The State of AP and 3 Ors.
Kakhto Sema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
