The petitioner was allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, a prayer not opposed by the respondents.
Prayer to withdraw writ petition allowed with liberty to approach appropriate forum if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040004472023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 172/2023
1:Joram Tommy S/o Lt. Joram Lalin, R/o Peni Village, PO/PS Yazali, Lower Subansiri District (AP)
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors.
to be Represented through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner Yachuli PO/PS Yazali Lower Subansiri District AP
3:Licha Anju
D/o Licha Pacha of Village Licha PO/PS Yazali Lower Subansiri District A
Advocate for the Petitioner : M Nibo
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 12.06.2023
Heard Mr. M. Nibo, learned counsel for the petitioner.
After arguing the matter for some time, Mr. M. Nibo prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
The prayer is not opposed by Mr. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.
The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed, with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Joram Tommy
The State of AP
Additional Deputy Commissioner Yachuli
Licha Anju
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
