Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent and had lost interest in pursuing the matter due to the long lapse of time.
Petitioner failed to appear; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010004702011
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1709/2011
SYED KHIRUL ANAM
S/O LT. SYED ASAD ULLAH BAPUJI PATH, P.O. NAZIRA, P.S. NAZIRA, DIST. SIBSAGAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER OF HOME TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISUR, GHY-6.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM ULUBARI GHY-5.
3:THE ASSTT. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE A
ASSAMM GHY.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
SIBSAGAR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.M BAISHYA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
Page No.# 2/2
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 14-06-2023
None appears for petitioner when the matter is called up. The petitioner’s counsel
was absent even on the past two consecutive occasions when this matter was called up before the Court.
Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam is present.
Having regard to the nature of issue involved in this writ petition and the relief
sought by the petitioner, it appears that due to long lapse of time, the petitioner has lost
interest to pursue the matter before this Court.
As such, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Syed Khirul Anam
State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
