The petitioner failed to appear in court despite prior notices. The court, having ordered previous consequences for default, proceeded ex parte and dismissed the writ petition accordingly. Interim orders were vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for default. All interim orders, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010010692021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1138/2021
MD. KHALIL ALI AND 3 ORS S/O- LT. DHANSA ALI, R/O- KHARGHULI, (BONDA), GHY-26, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2: MD. MOINUL ALI S/O- KHALIL ALI R/O- KHARGHULI (BONDA) GHY-26 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3: MD. RAFIK ALI S/O- KHALIL ALI R/O- KHARGHULI (BONDA) GHY-26 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4: NURMOHAMMAD ALI S/O- KHALIL ALI R/O- KHARGHULI (BONDA) GHY-26 KAMRUP (M) ASSA VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REP. BY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, NEW DELHI
2:COURT OF COMPETENT AUTHORITY GAIL INDIA LTD.
Page No.# 2/3
(GOVT. OF INDIA) MAHARATNA COMPANY BARUANI- GUWAHATI GAS PIPE LINE (BGPL) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OFFICE HOTEL ROYAL DE CASA BELTOLA- BASISTA ROAD WIRELESS BELTOLA GHY ASSAM PIN- 781028 3:DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) AT GUWAHATI 4:GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED GAIL BHAWAN 16 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI- 110066. 5:THE GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION) PIPELINE (BGPL) PROJECT 5TH FLOOR MEGHA PLAZA BASISTHA CHARIALI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781029
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B PHUKAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
03.01.2023
None appears for the petitioners on call. However, Shri S Mitra, learned counsel for the GAIL is present as well as Shri DS Deka, learned counsel for the respondent no.2-Competent Authority. Even, on earlier occasions, there were defaults on the part of the petitioners. In fact, this Court vide order dated 12.12.2022 had made it clear
Page No.# 3/3
that in case of further default, the Court would proceed in absence of the petitioners.
Since the petitioners have again defaulted today, the matter stands dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stand vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands dismissed for default due to non-appearance of petitioners.
MD. KHALIL ALI AND 3 ORS
THE UNION OF INDIA
COURT OF COMPETENT AUTHORITY GAIL INDIA LTD
THE GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION) PIPELINE PROJECT
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
