GAHC040003702023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
The I.A. disposed on withdrawal due to parties sought to be impleaded not being allowed in facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040003702023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl) 18/2023
1:Dr, Hano Romesh S/o Shri Hano Talang, R/o Village Bamin, PO/PS Ziro, Lower Subansiri District, (AP)
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented through Public Prosecutor.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Tshering Yangzom Bhutia
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 05-06-2023
Heard Mr. M Pertin, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. D. Tatak, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional PP for the respondents.
After arguing the matter for some time, the learned Senior counsel very fairly and as usual has prayed for withdrawal of the I.A., in view of the fact that perhaps the parties sought to be impleaded, cannot be allowed in the facts and
Page No.# 2/2
circumstances of the case.
Accordingly, the prayer is allowed.
The I.A.(Crl)/18/2023, is disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Dr. Hano Romesh
The State of AP and Others
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
