Disposed

Satish Kumar Pandey v. the State of Ap and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC9 Nov 2023IA(C)/48/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court considered an application to condone a delay of 201 days in filing a connected writ appeal. The court accepted the explanation that the appellant was suffering from severe jaundice and condoned the delay, listing the appeal for admission.

What did the court decide?

The delay of 201 days in filing the connected writ appeal is hereby condoned. The writ appeal is listed for admission on 14.11.2023.

Satish Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Ap and 4… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Gauhati HC (2023)

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC040003442023

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

Case No. : IA(C)/48/2023

¶5

Satish Kumar Pandey

¶6

S/o Uday Pratap Pandey, Permanent Resident of Chhawani Mulhala Ward No. 9 Bhabhua, Near Nirmal Mills, PO and PS Bhabhua, District Kaimur, Bihar. Phone No. 9033701578

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. Represented by the Commissioner (Education) to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Higher Education Deptt. Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Commissioner and Secretary Age: 0 Occupation :

¶9

3:The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Age: 0 Occupation : 4:Dheerendra Kr. Srivastava Age: 0 Occupation : 5:Md. Abdul Latif Age: 0 Occupation

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mudang Batt

¶11

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)

¶12

Page No.# 2/4

¶13

Linked Case : WA/9/2023 Satish Kumar Pandey Age: 33 Occupation : Address:S/o Uday Pratap Pandey Permanent Resident of Chhawani Mulhala Ward No. 9 Bhabhua Near Nirmal Mills PO and PS Bhabhua District Kaimur Bihar. Phone No. 9033701578 VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by the Commissioner (Education) to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Higher Education Deptt. Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Commissioner and Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Address:to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Finance Deptt. Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by its Secretary Itanagar (AP) 4:Dheerendra Kumar Srivastav Age: 0 Occupation : Address:C/o Office of the Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Itanagar (AP) 5:Md. Abdul Latif Age: 0 Occupation :

¶14

Page No.# 3/4

¶15

Address:S/o Late Abdul Kaddus Resident of Village Bhowkamari Post Office Kayakuchi District Barpeta Assam. -----------Advocate for : Mudang Batt Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors.: Advocate , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively.

¶16

BEFORE

¶17

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Date : 09.11.2023 (A. D. Choudhury, J)

¶20

This is an application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 201 days in filing the connected writ appeal.

¶21

The writ appellant, the respondent no. 5 has filed an objection to the condonation of delay.

¶22

Considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsels for the parties. The delay has been explained in Paragraph No. 8, inasmuch as, it is

¶23

Page No.# 4/4

¶24

his case that the writ appellant had been seriously ill and was under treatment suffering from severe Jaundice.

¶25

Considering the above explanation, the delay of 201 days in filing the connected writ appeal is hereby condoned.

¶26

The writ appeal be listed for admission on 14.11.2023, showing the name of the respective counsel representing the respondent no. 5.

¶27

Accordingly, the Interlocutory application stands disposed of.

¶28

JUDGE JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Satish Kumar Pandey v. the State of Ap and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Kumar Pandey v. the State of Ap and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karban Tamut Vs the State of Ap and 4 Ors.

Tachu Nabam and 69 Ors. Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.