Tassar Amko v. Tassar Rogi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court dismissed petitions IA(C) 158/2022 and CRP 11/2022 as the applicant/petitioner did not appear or take any steps before the court.
The Gauhati High Court dismissed petitions IA(C) 158/2022 and CRP 11/2022 as the applicant/petitioner did not appear or take any steps before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040009232022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 158/2022
1:Tassar Amko W/o Tassar Rogi, Permanent Resident of Village Hinda, PO Palin, PS Palin, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS 1:Tassar Rogi and Anr. S/o Late Tassar Bada, Resident of Yapap Village, PO Palin, PS Palin , Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2:All Gaon Burahs and Gaon Burish Association of Palin Through its President Shri Byabing Taying and General Secretary Shir Biki Eka AGAP Hall PO Palin Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Pramod Kr. Gour
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : CRP 11/2022
1:Tassar Amko W/o Tassar Rogi
Page No.# 2/3
Permanent Resident of Village Hinda PO Palin PS Palin Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS 1:Tassar Rogi and Anr. S/o Late Tassar Bada Resident of Yapap Village PO Palin PS Palin Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh. 2:All Gaon Burahs and Gaon Burish Association of Palin Through its President Shri Byabang Taying and General Secretary Shri Biri Eka AGAP Hall PO Palin Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : T Kumar Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 09-05-2023
Order dated 29.03.2023 shows that nobody appeared for the applicant.
Today also on call, none appears for the applicant.
Office note dated 08.05.2023 also shows that no steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Page No.# 3/3
In view of the above, both the IA(C)/158/2022 and CRP/11/2022 are
dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tassar Amko W/o Tassar Rogi
Tassar Rogi
All Gaon Burahs and Gaon Burish Association of Palin
KARDAK ETE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court