The Gauhati High Court allowed the withdrawal of an appeal petition filed by the appellant, holding it fit to dispose of the matter on withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the appeal petition allowed. FAO No. 1/2022 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030000792022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : FAO/1/2022
Sh. Lalbiaksiama and Anr. Bungkawn, Dam Veng
2: Sh. Lalbiakzuala Bungkawn Dam Veng Aizaw
VERSUS
Smt. H. Zothansangi and 4 Ors. Bungkawn, Dam Veng
2:Sh. Lalremsanga Bungkawn Aizawl
3:State of Mizoram r/b Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl
4:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl
5:The Settlement Officer Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizaw
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr B Lalramenga
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms Dinari T Azyu for R1-R2
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER
Date : 01.03.2023
Heard Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the appellant, who has prayed for withdrawal of his appeal petition for the reason that the appeal petition has now become infructuous.
Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 is present.
On the submission made for withdrawal of the appeal petition, this Court finds it fit to allow the withdrawal and FAO No. 1/2022 accordingly stands disposed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sh. Lalbiaksiama and Anr.
Smt. H. Zothansangi and 4 Ors.
Marli Vankung
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
