Abhinav Dugar v. Jinu Hazarika
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010095712023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010095712023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010095712023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/245/2023
ABHINAV DUGAR S/O- AMOLOK DUGAR, RESIDENT OF J.B. ROAD, TEZPUR TOWN, P.O. AND P.S.- TEZPUR, DISTRICT- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784001.
VERSUS
JINU HAZARIKA INVESTIGATING OFFICER (MAHABHAIRAB O.P.), C/O- OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR, DISTRICT- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784001.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINGH
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
15. 05. 2023
Heard Mr. B Pushilal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Page No.# 2/2
When the matter was listed on 10.05.2023, this court requested Mr. KK Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor to have instruction from the Officer-in-Charge of Mahabhairab Out Post, Sonitpur as it is alleged in the present contempt petition that even after receipt of an order dated 07.02.2023 passed in Crl. Pet. 106/2023 debarring the investigating authority to further proceed with the investigation in connection with Tezpur P.S. Case No. 1290/2022 corresponding to GR case No. 2440/2022, the investigating officer continued with the investigation, written letter to the Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Sonitpur, Tezpur and to the Tezpur Municipal Board.
Mr. Parasar after having instruction from the concerned police officer i.e. Ms. Jinu Hazarika has submitted that due to inadvertence though she has received the copy on 15.02.2023 issued the letters. However, immediately after getting the information, the said letter to the Branch Manager of the Bank concerned has been withdrawn and she has expressed her unconditional apology for this inadvertent mistake. It is also submitted by Mr. Parasar that she has also undertaken that she will not proceed any further with the investigation in term of the order dated 07.02.2023 passed in Crl. Pet. No. 106/2023 and the communication issued to the Tezpur Municipal Board has also been withdrawn.
In that view of the matter, this court has accepted such unconditional apology and accordingly the contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Abhinav Dugar
Jinu Hazarika
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court