Pinki Barman @ Pingki Barman v. Gyanendra Dev Tripathi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition filed before the Gauhati High Court regarding a contempt petition was disposed of because the petitioner instructed counsel not to press the same, resulting in the closure of the proceedings as not pressed.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010050942023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/136/2023
PINKI BARMAN @ PINGKI BARMAN W/O- LATE SHAYLEN BARMAN, R/O- VILL- PANIKHAITI RAILGATE, P.O- PANIKHAITI, P.S- PRAGJYOTISHPUR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781026
VERSUS
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI AND ANR
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE ( RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:PALLAV GOPAL JHA IAS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF KAMRUP METRO AT GUWAHATI LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI ASSAM PIN-78103
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R Deka
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R1)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PINKI BARMAN @ PINGKI BARMAN
- respondent
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE ( RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
- respondent
PALLAV GOPAL JHA IAS
- respondent
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF KAMRUP METRO AT GUWAHATI LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI ASSAM PIN-78103
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/136/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court