The Gauhati High Court held that the contempt case and the interlocutory application are infructuous and closed them as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010287012019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4036/2019
In Cont. Cas(C) No. 246/2019
SADHAN SARKAR @ SADHAN CH. SARKAR S/O LT. BANESWAR, VILL. ASHARIKANDI, DHUBRI, P.O. ASHARIKANDI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783301
VERSUS
UTPAL KR. SHARMA DIRECTOR, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, ASSAM, KHANAPARA, P.O. KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI 22
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S B CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
17-05-2023
Ms. S. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the contempt case, Cont. Cas(C) no. 246/2019 has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner, Contempt Case, Cont. Cas[C] no. 246/2019 as well as the interlocutory application, IA[C] no. 4036/2019 are closed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case and interlocutory application are infructuous and should be closed.
Sadhan Sarkar @ Sadhan Ch. Sarkar S/O Lt. Baneswar
Utpal Kr. Sharma
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
