Sukla Rani Deb v. the Union of India and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed an interlocutory application filed by Sukla Rani Deb as misconceived, holding that it could not adjudicate on a further cause of action arising after the disposal of the related writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory application stands closed. Liberty granted to approach again in the appropriate form.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010027682023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/393/2023
SUKLA RANI DEB W/O SRI RANJIT DEB, VILL- KATIRAIL, P.S. KATIGORAH, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN - 788805.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REP. BY THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, PIN -110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN -110001.
4:THE STATE COORDINATOR OF NATIONAL REGISTRAR OF CITIZEN ASSAM 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI - 781005.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain an interlocutory application raising a cause of action that arose subsequent to the disposal of the original writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SUKLA RANI DEB
- respondent
THE UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
- respondent
THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE STATE COORDINATOR OF NATIONAL REGISTRAR OF CITIZEN ASSAM
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil)/393/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court