Disposed

Abdul Rakhib Ali @ Abdul Rakhip Hoque and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC15 Feb 2023Bail Appln./492/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court dismissed two bail applications by applicants in Fatasil Ambari Police Station Case on the submission that the charge-sheet had been filed. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to seek regular bail in the trial court and allowed agitation regarding the timeline for charge-sheet submission there.

What did the court decide?

Applications closed granting liberty to petitioners to approach the trial court for regular bail.

Abdul Rakhib Ali @ Abdul Rakhip Hoque and Anr. Vs the State… — Bail and Remand | Gauhati HC (2023)

¶1

Page No. 1/4

¶2

GAHC010021162023

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : Bail Appln./406/2023

¶5

AMIR HAMJA AND 8 ORS. S/O ABDUL SALAM MONDAL, VILL.- MAKRAM BILL, P.S.- GOSAIGAON, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM.

¶6

2: MUNNAF ALI S/O ABDUL KUDDUS ALI VILL.- MAKRAM BILL P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM.

¶7

3: NURUL ISLAM S/O LT. RIYASUDDIN VILL.- MAKRAM BILL P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM.

¶8

4: MUKBUL HUSSAIN S/O ABDUL BATEN VILL.- MAKRAM BILL P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM.

¶9

5: AJAHAR ALI S/O ABDUL SALAM MONDAL VILL.- MAKRAM BILL P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM.

¶10

Page No. 2/4

¶11

6: JAMIRUL HUSSAIN S/O MOKBUL ALI VILL.- MAKRAM BILL P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM. 7: MANIK ALI S/O USUB ALI VILL.- BILASHIPARA P.S.- BILASHIPARA DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM. 8: NIJAMUDDIN S/O ISMAIL HUSSAIN VILL.- BILASHIPARA P.S.- BILASHIPARA DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM. 9: MAJIBUR ALI S/O LT. ABDUL KADER ALI VILL.- 1 NO. TASPUR BHUMKA P.S.- GOSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE P.P., ASSAM.

¶12

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY

¶13

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶14

Linked Case : Bail Appln./492/2023

¶15

ABDUL RAKHIB ALI @ ABDUL RAKHIP HOQUE AND ANR S/O- JAHIRUL HOQUE VILL.- YAMUNATARI P.O. KARTIMARI P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR, ASSAM

¶16

Page No. 3/4

¶17

2: ABDUL REJAK @ ABDUL REZZAK S/O- BELLAL SHEIKH @ BILLAL ALI VILL.- TENGNARBHITA P.O. TULSIBILL P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM VERSUS

¶18

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM

¶19

Advocate for : MR. M ALI Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶20

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Date : 15-02-2023

¶23

Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the accused-petitioners in B.A. no. 406/2023 and Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the accused-petitioners in B.A. no. 492/2023. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State of Assam.

¶24

By the two applications under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the accused-petitioners viz. [1] Amir Hamja, [2] Munnaf Ali, [3] Nurul Islam, [4] Mukbul Hussain, [5] Ajahar Ali, [6] Jamirul Hussain, [7] Manik Ali, [8] Nijamuddin and [9] Majibur Ali in B.A. no. 406/2023 and the accused-petitioners viz. [1] Abdul Rakhib Ali @ Abdul Rakhip Hoque and [2] Abdul Rejak @ Abdul Rezzak in B.A. 492/2023 have prayed for their release on bail in connection with Fatasil Ambari Police Station Case no. 247/2022 [corresponding G.R. Case no. 9240/2022], registered for offences under Sections 302/34, Indian Penal Code [IPC].

¶25

Today, Mr. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted, on instruction, that the Investigating Officer [I.O.] after completion of investigation of the case in connection

¶26

Page No. 4/4

¶27

with Fatasil Ambari Police Station Case no. 247/2022 has already submitted a charge-sheet under Section 173[2], CrPC vide Charge-Sheet no. 09[A]/2023 dated 10.02.2023. Mr. Parasar has further submitted, on the basis of telephonic instructions, that all the afore-mentioned accused-petitioners have been charge-sheeted.

¶28

In view of submission of the charge-sheet in Fatasil Ambari Police Station Case no. 247/2022, Mr. Chowdhury and Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the petitioners will approach the learned jurisdictional magistrate and/or jurisdictional trial court seeking regular bail.

¶29

In view of the above submission of Mr. Chowdhury and Mr. Ali, the two applications stand closed, granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the learned jurisdictional magistrate and/or the jurisdictional trial court.

¶30

At this stage, Mr. Chowdhury and Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the accused-petitioners in the two applications have submitted that the matter of submission of a charge-sheet within the period prescribed under Section 167[2], CrPC is relatable to the date on which the same is placed before the jurisdictional magistrate. The accused-petitioners are at liberty to agitate the issue before the learned jurisdictional magistrate and/or the jurisdictional trial court.

¶31

In the event the petitioners approach the jurisdictional Magistrate and/or the trial court by filing any application seeking regular bail, the jurisdictional Magistrate and/or the jurisdictional trial court will consider such application on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶32

JUDGE

¶33

Comparing Assistant

Abdul Rakhib Ali @ Abdul Rakhip Hoque and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Rakhib Ali @ Abdul Rakhip Hoque and Anr. v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazima Akter Siraji Vs the State of Assam and 14 Ors.

Monoranjan Sarma Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Noor Ahmed Mazumder and 11 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

M/S Tanor Engineering and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Amir Hamja and 8 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Md. Islam Ali Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.