Bail application filed by the accused was withdrawn by counsel on instructions, resulting in the disposal of the petition.
Granted liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Court again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010219762022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2867/2022
DEEPJYOTI KALITA
S/O- SRI PRANAB KALITA, R/O- VILL- DADARA (BARNAGALACHUPA), P.S. HAJO, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY P.P., ASSAM
2:MALABIKA KALITA W/O- SRI DWIJENDRA CHAHARIA OFFICE OF DISTRICT CHILD PROTECTION OFFICER KAMRUP AMINGAON PIN- 78103
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K BARMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
O R D E R
04.01.2023.
Heard Mr. R. Konwar, learned counsel for the accused. Also heard Mr. R.J.
Page No.# 2/2
Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent.
Mr. Konwar, learned counsel for the accused submits that he has the instruction to withdraw this petition.
Accordingly, Mr. Konwar is allowed to withdraw the petition and it stands disposed of on withdrawal, with the liberty to approach this Court again, by filing appropriate application, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Deepjyoti Kalita
The State of Assam
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
